|
Local Market Trends
Home prices posted near-record gains
throughout the Cascade foothills region in 2005
as a rising-interest-rate climate and a stable supply of available homes
continued to fuel buyer worries of declining home affordability.
While prices were up, total sales also
were up throughout the southern Clackamas County region, even though sales in
many rural parts of the region sagged. Preliminary figures from local Realtors® show that the number of Realtor®-assisted sales in
the southern region of the county rose almost 9 percent in 2005, with most of that increase coming
from the county's incorporated cities. The Colton area, which is primarily rural,
also saw a substantial gain, with sales increasing 20 percent.
Strong competition for available
properties also led to shorter marketing times, and homes tended to sell at or near their owners' asking prices.
Dozens of owners even made decisions either to get their asking prices or pull
their homes from the market and wait for prices to go still higher.
Owners selling without a broker probably also fared
better this year than most years because of the unusually quick market times. Historically, people who sell “For Sale By Owner” are successful only a small percentage of the time, according to national statistics.
Statistics compiled by The Foothills Report from Realtor®
transactions in 2005 show 1,980 sales were completed in the south county region.
This region includes both incorporated and unincorporated areas of the
communities of Oregon City, Molalla, Canby, Barlow, Wilsonville, Beavercreek,
Mulino and Colton, as well as small portions of unincorporated communities near
Aurora, Hubbard, Woodburn and Mt. Angel. Realtors®
assisted 1,819 sales in the same area in 2004.
Sales comparisons published in The Foothills Report in the
Winter 2005 issue did not include data for Wilsonville or Colton, nor for the
unincorporated areas of the county near Aurora, Hubbard, Woodburn and Mt. Angel.
Whatever the results in terms of the numbers of
sales for the region's various communities, prices everywhere were up
dramatically.
Molalla's median home price broke the $200,000
mark for the first time ever. This price, which included
sales both
in and out of the city limits, rose from $164,975 in 2004 to $202,000 in 2005,
an increase of 22.4 percent. A median-priced home is one whose price falls exactly in the middle of all homes sold, with half of the homes sold being priced higher, and half being priced lower.
Yet, total sales in Molalla declined in 2005
as builders introduced fewer new homes to the market. The Molalla area saw a
9.8-percent decline in sales overall, from 286 in 2004 to 258 last year.
While total sales here declined, sales
of new homes plummeted, falling more than 56 percent, from 105 in 2004 to 46
last year. Sales of existing homes
balanced out a substantial portion of the drop by rising 17 percent.
The average home sold in Molalla in 2005 was 21 years old, and had 1,749 square feet of total floor space. The average price per square foot was
$133.90. The size of the average lot sold was 3.09 acres, largely due to the
substantial size of some of the rural properties that surround the City of
Molalla. The median lot size was 0.20 acres.
The time from entry of a property into the
multiple listing database until contracting with a buyer, or average market
time, was 59 days in Molalla.
The median price in Mulino shot up just over 20 percent, closing out 2005 at
$293,000. The number of homes sold here was 41,
down 3 from the number sold in 2004. The average home sold was 35 years old and had
1,890 square feet of total floor space. The average price per square foot was
$165.44, and the average lot size was 7.26 acres. The average market time in
Mulino also was 59 days.
Meanwhile, the median price in Beavercreek
was up almost 27 percent, finishing the year at $338,000. The number of sales
was flat at 58, the same number as in 2004. The average home here was 30 years old and had
2,085 square feet of gross floor space. The average price per square foot was
$174.53, and the average lot size was 6.85 acres. The average market time was 94
days.
Colton saw the sharpest decline in average
market time in 2005. It took 152 days to find a buyer in 2004. That fell to just
68 days in 2005. Colton price gains were more modest than those in other areas, but
still posted a healthy 10.3-percent increase. The median price
rose to $247,000. The average home sold was 38 years old and had 1,714 square feet of total floor space on
7.75 acres. The average price per
square foot was $158.66.
The biggest sales growth last year took place in
Oregon City, where new home sales were up 56 percent, and sales of
existing homes were up 21 percent. Total sales were 966 in 2005, with 172 new homes sold. The previous year, 766 homes were sold, of which 110 were newly
built. The median price in 2005 was $269,995, up just over 17 percent from the previous
year. Preliminary estimates show the average
market time near 55 days.
Canby sales remained flat, rising by only two
units. But Canby prices rose by double digits. The median price in 2004 was $220,000,
jumping to $250,000 in 2005 with a total of 311 homes sold. Preliminary
estimates here show an average market time last year of about 50 days.
In Wilsonville, The
2005 "Street of Dreams" probably helped push home price statistics
even higher than they otherwise would have been. The median price was $356,750, a
27-percent increase over 2004. The number of homes sold last year was 276,
contrasted with 256 in 2004. Preliminary estimates show average market time here
near 60 days for the year.
Table
of Year-End Market Results, 2005
|
Month
|
Units
Listed |
Listed
Volume |
Listed
Average |
Units
Sold |
Sold
Volume |
Sold
Average |
Rough
DOM¹ |
| January |
176 |
58,776,256 |
333,956 |
117 |
32,138,262 |
274,686 |
63 |
| February |
186 |
68,490,036 |
368,226 |
102 |
26,258,166 |
257,433 |
67 |
| March |
208 |
75,765,248 |
364,256 |
174 |
48,553,308 |
279,042 |
59 |
| April |
240 |
85,435,680 |
355,982 |
186 |
58,465,008 |
314,328 |
56 |
| May |
250 |
87,543,250 |
350,173 |
177 |
51,476,202 |
290,826 |
45 |
| June |
282 |
109,491,576 |
388,268 |
183 |
59,347,998 |
324,306 |
39 |
| July |
258 |
94,603,440 |
366,680 |
178 |
60,107,040 |
337,680 |
40 |
| August |
265 |
102,824,240 |
388,016 |
244 |
80,179,620 |
328,605 |
32 |
| September |
225 |
80,035,425 |
355,713 |
187 |
71,625,114 |
383,022 |
42 |
| October |
172 |
61,857,220 |
359,635 |
142 |
42,673,698 |
300,519 |
34 |
| November |
171 |
63,511,110 |
371,410 |
141 |
46,783,941 |
331,801 |
41 |
| December |
126 |
46,138,554 |
366,179 |
149 |
50,398,864 |
338,247 |
43 |
 |
| Totals: |
2,559 |
934,472,015
|
365,171
|
1,980 |
628,007,221
|
317,175 |
46 |
 |
| Total Listed:
2,560 |
Sold Units:
1,980 |
Remaining
Units: 579 |
Inventory²
Accum: 3.51 |
Min Sold Price:
$67,100 |
Median
Sold Price:
$270,000 |
Average
Sold Price:
$317,175 |
Max Sold
Price:
$3,204,500 |
Source:
Regional
Multiple Listing Service, Portland,
Ore.
|
 |
|
1.
Rough days on market. Actual DOM is longer. Rough DOM varies due to
reporting inconsistencies among brokers, and is used only to analyze
market trends.
2. Inventory Accumulation represents
the amount of time, in months, that would be required to sell all existing
inventory if no new listings were received. The equation to calculate
Inventory Accumulation is A = R ÷ [S ÷ M], where A is Inventory
Accumulation, R is the number of remaining units, S is the number of sold
units, and M is the number of months in the reporting period.
|
|